Mark Inskip

Liberal Democrat District and Parish Councillor for Sutton Learn more

Crematorium Update; Soaring Expenditure and still No Planning Application

by markinskip on 30 April, 2021

Nearly a quarter of a million pounds will have been spent by East Cambs District Council on their project to build a crematorium on the site of Mepal Outdoor Centre by the time they submit their planning application. That was the shocking news given in answer to a question from my colleague councillor Lorna Dupré at last Thursday’s full council meeting. We are still waiting for first sight of the planning application. And there is no news of the findings of the public consultation survey that was held in January this year.

It is three months since I last wrote an update on the District Council’s plans to abandon the re-opening of Mepal Outdoor Centre and to instead build a crematorium on the site. In my last update I reported that over £130,000 had been known to have been spent on the crematorium project. Last Thursday that figure was confirmed to have risen to £218,935 with another £18,025 forecast to complete the planning application, giving a total expenditure of £236,960. A further £53,000 has been approved by the council to demolish the Outdoor Centre buildings. All of this expenditure is before any work starts on the development. The council estimates it will need to spend a further £6.54 million to develop the crematorium, leading to a total cost not far short of £7 million.

Many residents were shocked to learn in July 2020 that the district council had spent the previous 18 months secretly working on the crematorium plans. There had been no prior consultation with those living in the local area or the wider East Cambridgeshire district to establish whether there was public support, instead many had assumed the council were still investigating how to reopen the Outdoor Centre, a facility so many young people had previously enjoyed.

Finally in January of this year, a public consultation was launched on the plans. Residents who were unhappy with the proposals complained that the questions and frequent preset answers in the survey made it very difficult for them to express their opposition to the crematorium plans. The consultation closed on 1 February this year, but the council has not made the results public, raising further concerns about the way the project is being run.

On Monday 22 March the council’s Operational Services Committee met and discussed the council’s new East Cambridgeshire Youth Strategy and Action Plan. This strategy found that “having things to do and places to go were identified as matters of importance to young people”, it noted that “more open space and outdoor sports and recreation provision was identified as a need”. Three days later on Thursday 25 March the council’s Finance & Assets Committee decided to apply for planning permission to demolish all of the Outdoor Centre buildings, and to push on regardless with the crematorium project.

Meanwhile nearby crematorium provision is increasing. As most people are already aware, Fenland Crematorium in March is just 12 minutes drive by car from the Mepal Outdoor Centre. Next month work will complete on a new crematorium in Huntingdon, a 22 minute drive from Mepal Outdoor Centre. That facility is due to open in June. This adds to existing facilities such as Cambridge City Crematorium, West Suffolk Crematorium in Bury St Edmunds, Cam Valley Crematorium in Saffron Walden and Peterborough Crematorium. It is difficult to imagine there could be a strong business case for another crematorium on the Mepal Outdoor Centre site.

It is time for East Cambridgeshire District Council to be open and transparent about their crematorium project. When can we expect to see the planning application, originally due by the end of 2020? When will the results of the January public consultation be published? How much more public money will be committed to the project? How risky is the business case? And what hope is there that attention will be given to developing and restoring facilities for young people in the district?

   2 Comments

2 Responses

  1. Brian rollason says:

    Are these costs the reason why certain councillors are disappearing from their positions of trust, believing that if they go quietly people may not notice the total disregard for the people that they have shown and the total lack of respect they have for the people they were ment to represent. Typical ECDC councillors, only looking at benefitting themselves at the cost of the public, a simple case of not my money so it doesn’t matter how I spend it.

  2. Emma Watson says:

    I remain deeply disappointed that the Council have pushed plans to build a crematorium on the site of Mepal Outdoor Centre. As you note, Mark, it is on the doorstep of another crematorium, with others within easy reach.

    We elect our Councillors to represent us; so, there should be full transparency when considering creating a single-use, end-of-life facility to replace a venue which could be redeveloped and be full of life, offering a range of largely outdoor activities to individuals and groups, and which could garner great success and popularity, particularly in the context of the pandemic and lockdowns from which we are now steadily emerging, as many have nurtured an enjoyment of outdoor activity.

    Thank you for keeping us up to date, Mark and Lorna, and for probing for answers and accountability. Still hoping that the situation may turn around…

    Best wishes
    Emma Watson

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>