Mark Inskip

Liberal Democrat District and Parish Councillor for Sutton Learn more

Secret Crematorium Plan 18 months in the making, over £50,000 paid out

by markinskip on 16 August, 2020

Late in the evening on Friday 31 July residents officially learnt for the first time of East Cambs District Council plans to abandon the re-opening of Mepal Outdoor Centre and to instead build a crematorium. A month earlier Lib Dem councillors were told future options for the Outdoor Centre “has not been a priority looking at taking forward”. Yet new information reveals secret work on the crematorium started over eighteen months earlier with more than £50,000 spent on consultants, architect fees and investigations.

Outside the abandoned Mepal Outdoor Centre

Everyone realised after the public announcement of the plans that the council must have been working in secret for some time, the assumption was that this was up to six months. I can now reveal that they actually started working on a secret feasibility study for a crematorium in January 2019, more than 18 months earlier. The first payment to a management consultant was made on 28 January 2019. Opposition councillors were only made aware of the plans on 25 July 2020 and the public were only officially told on 31 July 2020, though they learnt of the plans a few days earlier through an exclusive story in the Ely Standard.

That first payment was one of five made to Hester Management Services Ltd between January 2019 and June 2020. Companies House records show this company is controlled by one individual, Shropshire based Alistair Merrick. At this time the public believed that the council was working with an operator on reopening Mepal Outdoor Centre.

At a meeting of East Cambs District Council’s Asset Committee on 8 October 2018 a report on the re-opening of the Outdoor Centre had been discussed, see the full report here. The report concluded by stating:

4.3. It is envisaged that these workstreams will converge to allow the first phase of reinstatement works to be carried out over the winter, with a view to the site re-opening for business in early summer 2019. It is not yet possible to provide a detailed timetable but officers will report back as such information becomes available.
4.4. We continue to receive new enquiries on a regular basis; all such enquirers are informed that the Council is following through the outcome of the market process undertaken last year, and that no new proposals will therefore be entertained at this stage.

The centre did not re-open in early summer 2019, no new proposals were considered, and the crematorium feasibility project had started months earlier.

What did happen in the summer of 2019 was that the council engaged Benchmark Architects Ltd, a Bedfordshire based company specialising in developing plans for new crematoria. By November of last year the council was also paying Cemetery Development Services Ltd, another Bedfordshire based company specialising in the development of new cemeteries and crematoria. In total between January 2019 and June 2020 the council made payments of £53,171.28 towards its crematorium plan.

Payments made by East Cambs DC January 2019 to June 2020

Further payments were made for a groundwater risk assessment, a topographical survey, and winter bird, breeding bird, reptile and botanical surveys.

It seems astonishing that the council’s Conservative controlled administration started work in January 2019 on a feasibility study for a crematorium when the public and opposition councillors were led to believe that the council was putting in place plans to reopen the Mepal Outdoor Centre in the summer of 2019.

A new letter was sent on Friday 14 August 2020 by the Conservative leader of the council to East Cambs Parish Councils. In it she reveals the previously confidential decision made by the council’s Finance & Assets committee meeting on 26 September last year. She states:

As the operator began to carry out detailed site investigations, they raised concerns that they were unable to deliver their proposal for the site, citing increasing costs and challenging conditions in the leisure industry which was causing a reduction to their income projections. In September 2019 the Finance and Assets Committee instructed Council to end discussions with the operator and explore alternative opportunities for the site.

This is of course nine months after the crematorium feasibility study had been kicked off. Is it disingenuous to suggest the council was exploring a range of alternative opportunities when thousands of pounds had already been spent on management consultant and architect fees to develop the crematorium plans?

If, like me, you think Mepal Outdoor Centre is the wrong location for a crematorium and that the council should instead engage with residents of the district and others interested in helping to build a successful future for Mepal Outdoor Centre as a leisure and learning centre sign the petition https://www.ecld.org.uk/moc

   6 Comments

6 Responses

  1. Tony says:

    I first discovered Mepal Outdoor Centre when I went there for a weekend’s camp with the scouts over 40 years ago. I would much prefer the next generation were able to enjoy the outdoor centre as I did, rather than me return there in an urn! Surely it must be easier to find an alternative location for a crematorium, than to replace an existing outdoor water activity centre? (Noting also that the increased population in the fens ought to make the outdoor centre more than viable if managed properly.)

  2. Chris Humphris says:

    What is ironic is that this is the wrong place for a crematorium. Ely has been dismissed twice by consultants over the last 10 years by leading crematorium developers. Is it a question of we could earn money with a crematorium where shall we put it or what can we do with this piece of land? Decision / client led consultancy?

    I have 15 years experience with another authority who do have a crem. I’m not banging a political drum, just a worried taxpayer.I

    I am not a LibDem voter, not will be, but some things cross party lines.

    • markinskip says:

      Thanks for your comment. The drive behind building a crematorium is to earn money. Even if for a moment I ignore the potential that a reinvigorated Outdoor Centre could have and were to accept it’s closure I share your concern that the business justification may well be flawed. Unfortunately as a councillor I’m forbidden from sharing those details, but why would you build a new crematorium 12 miles down the road from an existing one?

      • Sean gulliver says:

        Exactly. Why would you build a crematorium 12 miles up the road from another? That’s exactly what you are doing, as there is one in March!! Less than 12 miles away.
        How about funding the outdoor centre and bring it back up better than it was before?

  3. David Notarius says:

    A few years back, the Kings Ely school offer to either buy or manage the Mepal Center but the powers to be said they were reopening the center and had big plans to benifit the community. Why was Kings Ely School turned down?

  4. Geoff Tarrant says:

    The proposals seem to have been discussed behind closed doors with residents and local populations misled about the reopening . The public have been deceived as a major change of use has not been an option as far as they were aware .

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>